Friday, January 23, 2009

2009 Printz Predictions

I have a harder time trying to identify exactly what it is a Printz committee is looking for; I haven't read as many of the past winners and honors, and the guidelines are... odd, to say the least. (They read sort of like an email someone sent out in the middle of a discussion about how a young adult award winner should be chosen (scroll down to "Criteria").

I also haven't read some of the front-runners, like Paper Towns and Graceling. So my predictions aren't worth much. I've read 12 of the 30 suggested on Goodreads, plus I think some others that weren't on that list.

My Preferences:
What I Saw and How I Lied (Judy Blundell) already won a National Book Award, which disgruntled many, who think there were better books on the ticket. What fascinates me about this one is that it is, overall, a coming-of-age story--but couched in the terms of a classic film noir. Blundell carries it off beautifully, and it's something new.

Impossible (Nancy Werlin) is not a perfect contestant; it's sort of campy, maybe a little silly. But it's also compelling and fascinating. This is genre fiction that rises above itself.

Nation (Terry Pratchett) is a little muddy; it needs serious polish. (What I Saw is polished to within an inch of its life.) But I don't know that I read any other book this year that captured adolescence so perfectly, in the tentative almost-romance between Pacific Islander Mau and stranded Victorian Daphne. Mau angrily wonders about the validity of religion after his entire society is wiped out. Daphne struggles to live up to the potential she's tried to bury. Really funny jokes lighten the mood and carry the story along.

WHAT I THINK WILL WIN
I think Nation may have a real chance; there's also a whole lot of consensus behind The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks (E. Lockhart), which I found unremarkable. And there's so much talk about Graceling that I think it must have a shot.

The contender I disliked most was Madapple (Christina Meldrum), which I thought was exploitive and similar in tone and topic to many adult books that no one takes seriously, but it has some strong supporters.

What about The Hunger Games, you ask? I think it fits fine in either the Newbery or the Printz categories; I put it more on the Newbery side, because the treatment of the topic isn't really sophisticated. But I don't think it's good enough (everyone else has already said why: character, plot, etc). I wouldn't really object to seeing it get one of the honors, though, for either medal. It does what it does very well.

8 comments:

LaurieA-B said...

Someone today told me she thinks Little Brother will win. I have read Graceling, and it is made of awesome. Haven't read Madapple yet, I just read another rave review for it today. The nominees for that new first-time YA author award (William Morris Award?) all seem like possible Printz contenders.

Wendy Burton said...

I haven't read all the Morris nominees, but I think A Curse As Dark As Gold is a great contender for it, while not really strong enough for the Printz. But yes, I think they could probably all be taken seriously.

Rave reviews for Madapple mystify me.

Was the Little Brother person a kid or an adult? I simply can't imagine.

Eric said...

Ditto the impossibility of Little Brother (there is nothing distinguished about it). I am hoping that Disreputable History takes the gold. I would also love to see Octavian Nothing Vol. 2 get some recognition (i thought it was even better than the first).

LaurieA-B said...

Marcus, the main character, is 17. Little Brother got starred reviews in SLJ, PW, Horn Book, and Booklist. So it's definitely a contender.

Wendy Burton said...

I meant, was the person who said she thought Little Brother would win a kid or an adult?

LaurieA-B said...

Oh, it was an adult. And the reviewers who gave it starred reviews are, of course, adults.

Wendy Burton said...

I was looking at my spreadsheet of starred reviews, and they seemed sort of crazy, but then I remembered that starred reviews aren't necessarily given on anything like the ALA committees' award criteria; so they can give stars to books for sheer awesomeness, even if the writing is bad.

jessmonster said...

Doesn't it just make you wish you could overhear the committee's discussions? I would love to know not just what they picked, but what came really close - and why it didn't make it. Nation is in my to-read pile still. I'll be curious to hear that you think of Tender Morsels!